Everybody know that to get a job they need to make a good CV. That is the summary of your professional life. You tell in it that you consider most important for companies of last ages, jobs, studies, skills, achievements, courses, etc.
People believe that is sufficient just making a standar CV. But, If I tell you that recruiters just look your CV about 10 seconds for sort it in "Valid" or "Invalid". What do you think?
Think that you are working in RRHH department in a company. It has made a new vacancy and you have received 200 new CV. You are responsible recruiter and you start to take a quick look it. What will you do? Would you read all content of that CV or just do a quick look?
So that, Which is your criteria to choose the CV? That criteria is to take maximum information reading CV in just 10 seconds.
Also, We have to know that in England the most common way to read a CV is through softwares besides recruiters ( thing that in Spain it isn't common)
Well, last week I was in a 16 hours course which aim was to teach you about how make a good CV and tricks to do a good interview.
I thought that my CV was very good ( in format ) because I had attended a similar course in Spain. My surprise was that when I finished that course, I realized that information and format of my CV were useless.
But how tell all that I learnt in that 16 hours is imposible, I am doing a little summary about almost all tricks that I consider most important to make a successful CV in England:
- Full Name
- Adress (Just Postal Code and City)
- Key Words
- Format Documnets *.doc , no *.docx
- No Underline -> Software doesn't read underline words
- Dates: American Style
- Max. 2 pages
- No foto
- Personal message in your Mobile voicemail.
- Structure ( See my CV as a example )
- Specific Vocabulary about your field
- Corrected Spelling